Benefits and outcomes of implementing virtual health clinics in remote and underserved areas: a scoping review

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Access to quality healthcare is often limited in rural and underserved areas, leading to higher rates of preventable diseases, avoidable hospitalizations, and mortality. Virtual health clinics, utilizing telehealth and telemedicine technologies, offer a promising solution to bridge these gaps. This scoping review aimed to systematically identify and analyze the benefits, outcomes, and service range of virtual clinics in remote and underserved settings. Methods This scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage framework. Relevant literature was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google, and Google Scholar. Data were extracted using a standardized charting form and thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s method with MAXQDA software. Results A total of 38 benefits of virtual clinics were identified, primarily related to improved access to health services, reduced costs, and decreased patient travel. In the domain of governance and leadership, enhanced governmental support and optimal resource allocation were reported. For human resources, improved communication and training were emphasized. Moreover, the use of local technologies, remote medication ordering, and digital record-keeping demonstrated a significant impact, particularly in middle- and high-income countries. Conclusions Virtual clinics can effectively enhance the quality and accessibility of health services in underserved areas and play an important role in reducing health inequities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poudineh Moghadam, M., Bazi, A., Esfahani, P., & Emadi, V. (2025, December 12). Benefits and outcomes of implementing virtual health clinics in remote and underserved areas: a scoping review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325103310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free