Nutritional therapy and infectious diseases: A two-edged sword

25Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The benefits and risks of nutritional therapies in the prevention and management of infectious diseases in the developed world are reviewed. There is strong evidence that early enteral feeding of patients prevents infections in a variety of traumatic and surgical illnesses. There is, however, little support for similar early feeding in medical illnesses. Parenteral nutrition increases the risk of infection when compared to enteral feeding or delayed nutrition. The use of gastric feedings appears to be as safe and effective as small bowel feedings. Dietary supplementation with glutamine appears to lower the risk of post-surgical infections and the ingestion of cranberry products has value in preventing urinary tract infections in women. © 2006 Donabedian; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donabedian, H. (2006, September 4). Nutritional therapy and infectious diseases: A two-edged sword. Nutrition Journal. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-5-21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free