Comparison of chilled ceiling and mixing ventilation assisted by intermittent personalized ventilation: Thermal comfort and energy savings

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The integration of intermittent personalized ventilation in office spaces equipped with chilled ceiling and mixing ventilation has been proven to enhance comfort and provide energy savings. However, the performance of the intermittent personalized ventilation has not been compared between both systems. This is important to see under which system the intermittent personalized ventilation performs best. In this work, two office spaces equipped with a chilled ceiling/mixing ventilation coupled with intermittent personalized ventilation were modelled using validated CFD models. The intermittent jet was supplied towards an infected occupant at an average flow rate of 7.5 L/s. The frequency of the intermittent PV was varied in each case. It was found that the intermittent personalized ventilator provided better thermal comfort in the case of chilled ceiling under neural to warm conditions (14% increase compared to MV systems). However, twice as much energy savings were obtained in the case of mixing ventilation than chilled ceilings. Therefore, it is better off to operate intermittent PVU under MV systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al Assaad, D., Ghali, K., & Ghaddar, N. (2020). Comparison of chilled ceiling and mixing ventilation assisted by intermittent personalized ventilation: Thermal comfort and energy savings. Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 18, 431–436. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj18.370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free