What Is Valued and What Counts: Relationality, Gender, and Science Communication in Scientific Societies

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Feminist scholars critique conceptions of society as an aggregate of primarily self-interested and self-sufficient individuals who operate independently, challenging assumptions of atomistic individualism in neoliberal societies. Instead, they emphasize humans as inherently relational. However, valuing relationality raises issues, as women’s relational roles are often undervalued, reinforcing gendered expectations tied to self-sacrifice and caregiving. Within scientific societies, science communication exemplifies these dynamics, revealing the benefits and pitfalls of relational work. Drawing on a national survey and qualitative interviews with science communicators, this research contributes to feminist discussions on advancing gender equity and addressing the challenges of relational work within workplace contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papadelos, P., & Beasley, C. (2026). What Is Valued and What Counts: Relationality, Gender, and Science Communication in Scientific Societies. Science Communication, 48(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470251321075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free