Auditing the Editor: A Review of Key Translational Issues in Epigenetic Editing

11Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Currently, most advances in site-specific epigenetic editing for human use are concentrated in basic research, yet, there is considerable interest to translate this technology beyond the bench. This review highlights recent developments with epigenetic editing technology in comparison with the canonical CRISPR-Cas genome editing, as well as the epistemic and ethical considerations with preemptive translation of epigenetic editing into clinical or commercial use in humans. Key considerations in safety, equity, and access to epigenetic editing are highlighted, with a spotlight on the ethical, legal, and social issues of this technology in the context of global health equity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huerne, K., Palmour, N., Wu, A. R., Beck, S., Berner, A., Siebert, R., & Joly, Y. (2022, April 1). Auditing the Editor: A Review of Key Translational Issues in Epigenetic Editing. CRISPR Journal. Mary Ann Liebert Inc. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2021.0094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free