Whitehead and marcuse: The great refusal, universals and rational critical theories

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Essential elements of Marcuse's Critical Theory can be better understood and appreciated when their Whiteheadian origins are examined. Marcuse's recourse to Whitehead's philosophy in both Eros and Civilization and One Dimensional Man has escaped explicit and sustained attention and this essay addresses this lacuna. The primary theme of the essay therefore consists of a careful examination of the instances of terminological and textual intersection grouped around three headings: the great refusal, universals and reason. A secondary objective that focuses the investigation concerns 'provisional realism'. The phrase 'provisional realism' was used by Whitehead infrequently. I adopt it here to suggest the shared metaphysical concerns of Critical Theory and Whitehead's philosophy. The great refusal is an appeal to a provisional realism implicating universals functioning as the intersection of actuality with possibility. This in turn facilitates the expansion and intensification of human reason as an agency in history. Copyright © 2007 SAGE Publications London.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moore, D. (2007). Whitehead and marcuse: The great refusal, universals and rational critical theories. Journal of Classical Sociology, 7(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X07073953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free