Investigation of bioequivalence between brand-name and generic irinotecan products

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: To investigate bioequivalence among generic and brand-name irinotecan products. Materials and Methods: Products of Yakult and Daiichi-Sankyo (brandname products), Sandoz, Nippon Kayaku, Taiho, and Sawai were compared with respect to their composition and antitumor activity. Results: High-performance liquid chromatography demonstrated that related substances were within the acceptable range. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay revealed significant differences in cytotoxicity for four cancer cell lines among the products. The concentration of the active compound SN-38 was highest in Yakult's product (23.82 ng/ml) and lowest in Daiichi-Sankyo's product (8.96 ng/ml). MTT assay data were correlated with the SN-38 concentration, suggesting that it influenced differences in cytocidal activity among products. However, the SN-38 concentration was far lower than that of irinotecan (20 mg/ml), suggesting a negligible clinical effect. Metabolism of irinotecan to SN-38 or open-ring forms did not differ significantly among the products. Conclusion: The generic products showed equivalent efficacy and safety to the brand-name products.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saito, K. I., Inoue, Y., Ikegami, Y., Nanbo, I., Onozuka, M., Sano, K., … Kitazawa, T. (2016). Investigation of bioequivalence between brand-name and generic irinotecan products. Anticancer Research, 36(11), 5957–5963. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.11183

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free