Why Do Open-Source LLMs Struggle with Data Analysis? A Systematic Empirical Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) hold promise in automating data analysis tasks, yet open-source models face significant limitations in these kinds of reasoning-intensive scenarios. In this work, we investigate strategies to enhance the data analysis capabilities of open-source LLMs. By curating a seed dataset of diverse, realistic scenarios, we evaluate model behavior across three core dimensions: data understanding, code generation, and strategic planning. Our analysis reveals three key findings: (1) Strategic planning quality serves as the primary determinant of model performance; (2) Interaction design and task complexity significantly influence reasoning capabilities; (3) Data quality demonstrates a greater impact than diversity in achieving optimal performance. We leverage these insights to develop a data synthesis methodology, demonstrating significant improvements in open-source LLMs’ analytical reasoning capabilities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, Y., Zhong, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Qiao, S., Luo, Y., … Chen, H. (2026). Why Do Open-Source LLMs Struggle with Data Analysis? A Systematic Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 40, pp. 35239–35247). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v40i41.40831

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free