La estructura de las revoluciones científicas según thomas kuhn en el análisis de la historia del arte

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article offers some solutions to problems relating to the theory and methodology of a particular piece of research into modern and contemporary landscaping. It concerns the dynamic processes of theoretical, epistemological and formal changes in the visual arts in the 20th and 21st centuries. The analysis, based on the structuralism of scientific revolutions first published by Thomas Kuhn, offers some answers to the debate on the articulation of paradigms in the history of science, according to Kuhn, instead of the articulation of styles in art history, according to Heinrich Wölfflin, Meyer Shapiro and Ernst Gombrich, among others, considering science and art as entities of a different nature. Kuhn’s approach to art history, particularly to the work of Gombrich, leads us to draw a parallel between science and art in Kuhn’s work, where he attempted to articulate paradigms in art history.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Villalpando, M. E. R. (2017). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas según thomas kuhn en el análisis de la historia del arte. Arbor, 193(783). https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2017.783n1003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free