Comparison of tilmicosin and gamithromycin for treatment of undifferentiated fever in backgrounded winter-placed feedlot calves

  • Van Donkersgoed J
  • Merrill J
  • Hendrick S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A study was conducted in Alberta, Canada utilizing 2 feedlots to compare clinical efficacy of tilmicosin to gamithromycin for the initial treatment of undifferentiated fever in backgrounded winter-placed feedlot calves. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) in undifferentiated fever relapse rates and crude case fatality or bovine respiratory disease/histophilus fatality rates between the 2 treatments. As a result, the cost-benefit was based on the difference in treatment cost between the 2 drugs. Using current drug costs and a treatment weight of 750 lb (340 kg), tilmicosin had an economic advantage of $2.23CAN per head over gamithromycin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Donkersgoed, J., Merrill, J. K., & Hendrick, S. (2013). Comparison of tilmicosin and gamithromycin for treatment of undifferentiated fever in backgrounded winter-placed feedlot calves. The Bovine Practitioner, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol47no1p15-21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free