Critical evaluation of large language models for human cross-sectional anatomy identification: implications for collaborative intelligence

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Rapid advances in artificial intelligence have increased interest in using large language models (LLMs) for medical education and clinical applications. This exploratory study evaluated the ability of three multimodal LLMs, ChatGPT 5, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and Grok 4, to identify anatomical structures in cross-sectional images of the upper and lower limbs. Results: Twenty cross-sectional images, each highlighting a single anatomical structure, were presented to the models with standardized prompts specifying the anatomical region. Accuracy was scored for each model. ChatGPT 5 correctly identified 9 of 20 structures (45%, 95% CI: 23.1–68.5%), Gemini 2.5 Flash 5 of 20 (25%, 95% CI: 8.7–49.1%), and Grok 4 4 of 20 (20%, 95% CI: 5.7–43.7%). A qualitative error analysis revealed common misclassification patterns. These results indicate modest accuracy under the tested conditions and highlight areas for model improvement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kermansaravi, A., Tonekabonipour, E., Abdelhalim, M., Dar, S. F., & Amr, B. (2026). Critical evaluation of large language models for human cross-sectional anatomy identification: implications for collaborative intelligence. BMC Research Notes, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07634-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free