Optimizing DBSCAN Parameters for Depth-Based Earthquake Clustering Using Grid Search

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of accurately clustering earthquake events based on depth to better understand seismic activity patterns in Sulawesi from 2019 to 2023. Traditional clustering algorithms often fail to capture the complex spatial and depth-based structures of earthquake data. To overcome this, we employed the DBSCAN algorithm, which is well-suited for identifying irregularly shaped clusters and handling noise in spatial datasets. A key focus of this research is the systematic optimization of DBSCAN’s parameters—epsilon (ε) and minimum samples (min_samples)—using a grid search approach. Epsilon values varied from 0.1 to 0.5, and min_samples ranged from 6 to 60. The optimal parameters, determined using the Calinski-Harabasz (CH) index, were ε = 0.4 and min_samples = 54. Compared with previous heuristic settings, the optimized configuration produced better separated and more interpretable clusters. Using the optimized parameters, nine distinct clusters were identified, capturing meaningful patterns in both depth and magnitude. The results revealed that shallow earthquakes (0– 20 km) tend to exhibit greater magnitude variation, with some clusters averaging magnitudes up to 3.7. This suggests a higher seismic hazard potential associated with brittle crustal activity. The findings contribute to seismic hazard analysis by providing a more robust understanding of three-dimensional earthquake distribution, aiding regional risk assessment and disaster preparedness efforts. These insights can support agencies such as BMKG and BPBD in hazard mapping, sensor deployment, and contingency planning for high-risk zones.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rushendra, Wijaya, O. O., Yusuf, M., Setiyaji, A., & Prabowo, D. (2025). Optimizing DBSCAN Parameters for Depth-Based Earthquake Clustering Using Grid Search. Jurnal RESTI, 9(4), 850–864. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v9i4.6521

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free