Semen collection from mice: Electrojaculation

37Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The effects of device type (electrostimulator, function generator or computer-generated waveforms), waveform (square, triangle or sine wave), probe type (ring or strip) and anaesthetic compound (ketamine/xylazine combination or pentobarbitone sodium) were investigated on electroejaculation (EEJ) responses of C57B1 x CBA and C57B1/6J mice. Ejaculates were analysed for total sperm count and motility variables using computer-assisted sperm analyses. Automated computer-generated waveforms delivered through a sound card were more effective and reproducible compared with waveforms generated by function generator and electrostimulator. Sine waves and triangle waves were found to be more effective in producing ejaculate than square waves. As an anaesthetic, pentobarbitone sodium tended to outperform ketamine/xylazine across waveforms and strains. Strip probes failed to produce any ejaculate regardless of the device or waveform employed. Sperm obtained by EEJ exhibited poor motility and C5B1/6J mice had lower motility variables than C57B1 x CBA mice.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tecirlioǧlu, R. T., Hayes, E. S., & Trounson, A. O. (2002). Semen collection from mice: Electrojaculation. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 14(5–6), 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1071/rd02015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free