Direct Comparison of Four Hematopoietic Differentiation Methods from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

23Citations
Citations of this article
130Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Tursky and colleagues addressed a vital, unmet need to aid method selection for iPSC hematopoietic differentiation for research and potentially clinical use, comparing four representative serum- and feeder-layer-free methods. Assessments include production efficiency of CD34+ and functional hematopoietic progenitor cells, cost-benefit analysis, and ability to recapitulate aberrant hematopoiesis. An optimized method proved the most efficient, cost-effective, and sensitive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tursky, M. L., Loi, T. H., Artuz, C. M., Alateeq, S., Wolvetang, E. J., Tao, H., … Molloy, T. J. (2020). Direct Comparison of Four Hematopoietic Differentiation Methods from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports, 15(3), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.07.009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free