DO INSTITUTIONS MITIGATE THE RISK OF NATURAL RESOURCE CONFLICTS?

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The resource curse, as manifested by an increased likelihood of conflict over rents, can be mitigated by institutions. Lei and Michaels find that discoveries of “giant” oil fields increase the likelihood of violent conflict, but they find no evidence that democratic institutions mitigate this risk. We test whether institutions mitigate the resource curse by reducing the risk of natural resource conflicts. Our results indicate that high quality economic institutions reduce the likelihood of territorial (separatist) conflicts following natural resource rent windfalls. Highly autocratic and highly democratic institutions also reduce the likelihood of territorial conflict after natural resource rent windfalls. (JEL Q34, O13, P48, D74).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Reilly, C., & Murphy, R. H. (2017). DO INSTITUTIONS MITIGATE THE RISK OF NATURAL RESOURCE CONFLICTS? Contemporary Economic Policy, 35(3), 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free