Two Logics: The Conflict Between Classical and Neo-Analytic Philosophy.

  • Stoothoff R
  • Veatch H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This book is a consideration of the differences between Aristotelian and symbolic logic (and the metaphysical assumptions they come packaged with) and the consequences these have for how we view the world. What Veatch propose is to try to exhibit with respect to several of the key logical tools and devices – propositions, inductive and deductive arguments, scientific and historical explanations, definitions, etc. – how these several instruments are differently conceived, both as to their natures and their functions, in each of these respective logics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stoothoff, R. H., & Veatch, H. B. (1970). Two Logics: The Conflict Between Classical and Neo-Analytic Philosophy. The Philosophical Quarterly, 20(80), 283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2218416

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free