Breast cancer survival and prognosis by screening history

14Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:Cancers not detected by breast screening are commonly assumed to have poorer prognosis.Methods:We examined the survival experience of all women aged 50-74 years diagnosed with a first breast cancer between 1998 and 2006 in British Columbia, Canada and determined their screening experience. Disease-specific survival rates were calculated and, for cases diagnosed in 2002, prognostic factors (size, nodal involvement, grade ER status and stage) were examined by time since screening.Results:Breast cancers diagnosed at screening had the best survival (P<0.001). Cancers detected within 12 months of a negative screen had similar survival rates (P=0.98) to those diagnosed within 12-23 and 24-47 months, with other non-screen-detected cancers having poorer survival (P<0.001). The prognostic profile of cancers diagnosed in 2002 followed a similar pattern.Interpretation:There was no evidence that cancers diagnosed within 12 months had poorer prognosis than those diagnosed up to 48 months following screening. © 2014 Cancer Research UK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coldman, A. J., & Phillips, N. (2014). Breast cancer survival and prognosis by screening history. British Journal of Cancer, 110(3), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.732

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free