Abstract
Background:Cancers not detected by breast screening are commonly assumed to have poorer prognosis.Methods:We examined the survival experience of all women aged 50-74 years diagnosed with a first breast cancer between 1998 and 2006 in British Columbia, Canada and determined their screening experience. Disease-specific survival rates were calculated and, for cases diagnosed in 2002, prognostic factors (size, nodal involvement, grade ER status and stage) were examined by time since screening.Results:Breast cancers diagnosed at screening had the best survival (P<0.001). Cancers detected within 12 months of a negative screen had similar survival rates (P=0.98) to those diagnosed within 12-23 and 24-47 months, with other non-screen-detected cancers having poorer survival (P<0.001). The prognostic profile of cancers diagnosed in 2002 followed a similar pattern.Interpretation:There was no evidence that cancers diagnosed within 12 months had poorer prognosis than those diagnosed up to 48 months following screening. © 2014 Cancer Research UK.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Coldman, A. J., & Phillips, N. (2014). Breast cancer survival and prognosis by screening history. British Journal of Cancer, 110(3), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.732
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.