Controversies and advances in adult intracranial bypass surgery in 2020

31Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cerebral revascularization utilizing a variety of bypass techniques can provide either flow augmentation or flow replacement in the treatment of a range of intracranial pathologies, including moyamoya disease, intracranial atherosclerotic disease, and complex aneurysms that are not amenable to endovascular or simple surgical techniques. Though once routine, the publication of high-quality prospective evidence, along with the development of flow-diverting stents, has limited the indications for extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass. Nevertheless, advances in imaging, assessment of cerebral hemodynamics, and surgical technique have changed the risk-benefit calculus for EC-IC bypass. New variations of revascularization surgery involving multiple anastomoses, flow preserving solutions, IC-IC constructs, and posterior circulation bypasses have been pioneered for otherwise difficult to treat pathology including giant aneurysms, dolichoectasia, and medically refractory intracranial atherosclerosis. This review provides a practical update on recent advances in adult intracranial bypass surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raper, D. M. S., Caleb Rutledge, W., Winkler, E. A., Meisel, K., Callen, A. L., Cooke, D. L., & Abla, A. A. (2021, January 1). Controversies and advances in adult intracranial bypass surgery in 2020. Operative Neurosurgery. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa276

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free