Educational note: Addressing special cases of bias that frequently occur in perinatal epidemiology

88Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The epidemiologic study of pregnancy and birth outcomes may be hindered by several unique and challenging issues. Pregnancy is a time-limited period in which severe cohort attrition takes place between conception and birth and adverse outcomes are complex and multi-factorial. Biases span those familiar to epidemiologists: selection, confounding and information biases. Specific challenges include conditioning on potential intermediates, how to treat race/ethnicity, and influential windows of prolonged, seasonal and potentially time-varying exposures. Researchers studying perinatal outcomes should be cognizant of the potential pitfalls due to these factors and address their implications with respect to formulating questions of interest, choice of an appropriate analysis approach and interpretations of findings given assumptions. In this article, we catalogue some of the more important potential sources of bias in perinatal epidemiology that have more recently gained attention in the literature, provide the epidemiologic context behind each issue and propose practices for dealing with each issue to the extent possible.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neophytou, A. M., Kioumourtzoglou, M. A., Goin, D. E., Darwin, K. C., & Casey, J. A. (2021). Educational note: Addressing special cases of bias that frequently occur in perinatal epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 50(1), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa252

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free