Abstract
This study reports an experiment conducted on 110 ESL university students comparing a standardized traditional reading test with a multiple-choice cloze test and a short-context test with a criterion of teacher ratings as measures of growth in reading ability. Results indi cate no evidence that the cloze test or the short-context test performed in a superior manner to the traditional test. Questions are raised as to the nature of growth in reading skills and also as to the validity of the cloze procedure as a measure of across-time gains in reading and of reading proficiency. © 1987, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Jafarpur, A. (1987). Are Standardized Tests Sensitive to ESL Students’ Growth? RELC Journal, 18(2), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828701800205
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.