Are Standardized Tests Sensitive to ESL Students' Growth?

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study reports an experiment conducted on 110 ESL university students comparing a standardized traditional reading test with a multiple-choice cloze test and a short-context test with a criterion of teacher ratings as measures of growth in reading ability. Results indi cate no evidence that the cloze test or the short-context test performed in a superior manner to the traditional test. Questions are raised as to the nature of growth in reading skills and also as to the validity of the cloze procedure as a measure of across-time gains in reading and of reading proficiency. © 1987, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jafarpur, A. (1987). Are Standardized Tests Sensitive to ESL Students’ Growth? RELC Journal, 18(2), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828701800205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free