Public interest litigation protection policy of commemorative architectural cultural heritage: a case study from China

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Memorial architectural cultural heritage imbues a nation’s essence and vitality. The public interest litigation mechanism effectively shields against infringements on this heritage. Drawing upon the Interest Balance theory, this article employs quantitative statistical analysis and case studies to emphasize the crucial role of the public interest litigation protection mechanism in safeguarding memorial architectural cultural heritage. By examining public interest litigation cases involving the Great Wall’s historical and cultural heritage, this article discusses the interplay between China’s judicial policy preferences and public interest litigation in balancing social, national, economic, and government interests. This study broadens the scope of judicial protection measures for commemorative architectural cultural heritage. It aims to curb risky behaviors that might harm cultural relics, safeguarding the social public interests through public interest litigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, B., Yang, X., & Xiao, H. (2025). Public interest litigation protection policy of commemorative architectural cultural heritage: a case study from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04738-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free