Standard Error Biases When Using Generated Regressors in Accounting Research

50Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We analyze the standard error bias associated with the use of generated regressors—independent variables generated from first-step regressions—in accounting research settings. Under general conditions, generated regressors do not affect the consistency of coefficient estimates. However, commonly used generated regressors can cause standard errors to be understated. Problematic generated regressors include predicted values, coefficient estimates, and measures derived from these estimates. Widely used generated regressors in accounting include measures of earnings persistence, normal accruals, litigation risk, and conditional conservatism. Using simple regression models and simulation, we demonstrate how generated regressors can produce understated standard errors in accounting research settings. We also demonstrate how the magnitude of the standard error bias is inversely related to the precision of the generated regressor. Finally, we discuss bootstrapping as a correction for the bias and demonstrate the pairs cluster bootstrap as a tool to improve inferences in common accounting settings involving generated regressors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, W., Hribar, P., & Melessa, S. (2023). Standard Error Biases When Using Generated Regressors in Accounting Research. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(2), 531–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12470

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free