Connections between the Model of the Supreme Public Audit Institution and Some Economic, Social, Political, and Cultural Variables

  • Cîmpan M
  • Pacuraru-Ionescu C
  • Borlea S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Practically, all the countries of the world have at least one Supreme Audit Institution (SAI), but the organizational model and its attributions are different. Academic literature has identified three major types of models: Westminster, judicial and council, but there are also hybrid or original models. This study evaluates the differences between them and the correlations of each institutional type with economic development, education, political rights, civil liberties, and national cultural variables. Comparisons are made within the institutional theories regarding three types of isomorphism: coercive, mimetic and normative. These isomorphic trends are only partially evidenced by the empirical analysis carried out.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cîmpan, M., Pacuraru-Ionescu, C.-P., Borlea, S. N., & Jansen, A. (2023). Connections between the Model of the Supreme Public Audit Institution and Some Economic, Social, Political, and Cultural Variables. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 17(1), 2036–2052. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free