Evacuation planning is an essential part of disaster management where the goal is to relocate people in a safe and orderly manner. Existing research has shown that such problems are hard to approximate and current methods are difficult to scale to real-life applications. We introduce a notion of fairness and two related objectives while studying evacuation planning, namely: minimizing maximum inconvenience and minimizing average inconvenience. We show that both problems are not just NP-hard to solve exactly, but in fact are NP-hard to approximate. On the positive side, we present a heuristic optimization method MIP-LNS, based on the well-known Large Neighborhood Search framework, that can find good approximate solutions in reasonable amount of time. We also consider a multi-objective problem where the goal is to minimize both objectives and solve it using MIP-LNS. We use real-world road network and population data from Harris County in Houston, Texas (a region that needed large-scale evacuations in the past), and apply MIP-LNS to calculate evacuation plans for the area. We compare the quality of the plans in terms of evacuation efficiency and fairness. We find that the solutions to the multi-objective problem are superior in both of these aspects. We also perform statistical tests to show that the solutions are significantly different.
CITATION STYLE
Islam, K. A., Chen, D. Q., Marathe, M., Mortveit, H., Swarup, S., & Vullikanti, A. (2022). Incorporating Fairness in Large-scale Evacuation Planning. In International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings (pp. 3192–3201). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511808.3557075
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.