Science versus empiricism

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Few debates within dentistry have aroused such strong feelings as the issue of orthodontic growth guidance. Most orthodontists consider that appliances have little influence beyond the teeth and alveolus. If there is not room, it is argued, extractions are inevitable. Despite this a sizable minority, mostly of general dentists, believe that it is possible to influence skeletal form significantly. Why is there such lack of consensus? © British Dental Journal 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mew, J. (2005, October 22). Science versus empiricism. British Dental Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812851

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free