Robustness to systematics for future dark energy probes

31Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We extend the figure of merit formalism usually adopted to quantify the statistical performance of future dark energy probes to assess the robustness of a future mission to plausible systematic bias. We introduce a new robustness figure of merit which can be computed in the Fisher matrix formalism given arbitrary systematic biases in the observable quantities. We argue that robustness to systematics is an important new quantity that should be taken into account when optimizing future surveys. We illustrate our formalism with toy examples, and apply it to future Type Ia supernova (SNIa) and baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) surveys. For the simplified systematic biases that we consider, we find that SNeIa are a somewhat more robust probe of dark energy parameters than the BAO. We trace this back to a geometrical alignment of systematic bias direction with statistical degeneracy directions in the dark energy parameter space. © 2011 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2011 RAS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

March, M. C., Trotta, R., Amendola, L., & Huterer, D. (2011). Robustness to systematics for future dark energy probes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 415(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18679.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free