Functional relationships between airborne fungal spores and enviromental factors in kitchener-waterloo, Ontario, as detected by canonical correspondence analysis

60Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Outdoor air-sampling surveys were conducted in February, May, August and December 1992 with a Samplair-MKI particle sampler at 50 randomly chosen sites in the Kitchener-Waterloo area of southern Ontario, Canada. Canonical Correspondence Analysis of the resulting data revealed that the influence of some environmental factors on the airborne fungal spora varied with the season of the year. Among the 16 environmental factors measured at each sampling time, the most important were found to be: Relative humidity, rain, vegetation, cloud, temperature, and wind speed, in descending order. The composition of the airborne fungal spora also changed with the season. The dominant Cladosporium, Alternaria and Aspergillus + Penicillium were found at all seasons, but Ganoderma, Leptosphaeria, Coprinus, and Polythrincium occurred mainly in summer. Positive relations were revealed between, on the one hand, (la) relative humidity, (lb) rain, (lc) cloud and (ld) temperature, and on the other hand, (2) high spore counts of Leptosphaeria, Xylariaceae, unidentified Ascomy- cetes, and Ganoderma. A similar relationship was detected between (1) vegetation and (2) Alternaria and Oidium. (1) Higher wind speeds were positively related with (2) hyphal fragments and relatively large spores, such as those of Drechslera, Nigrospora, Periconia, and Oidium. Canonical Correspondence Analysis provides both a new approach to the analysis of aeromycological data and informative graphical presentations of the results. © 1994 Scandinavian University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, D. W., & Kendrick, B. (1994). Functional relationships between airborne fungal spores and enviromental factors in kitchener-waterloo, Ontario, as detected by canonical correspondence analysis. Grana, 33(3), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00173139409428995

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free