The authors reply: Letter on: “pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: A need for a reference standard” by clark et al.

10Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

However, semantics aside, we think that DXA can indeed serve as a reference standard for measuring muscle mass. Obviously, CT and MRI are advanced techniques that can and have been used to obtain important information such as muscle size/vol-ume and more recently amount and distribution of intra-and intermuscular adipose tissue. Also individual muscles can be assessed separately. However, with respect to muscle mass, the comparison of DXA with CT/MRI is rather difficult because DXA and QCT/MRI measure different physical parameters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buckinx, F., Landi, F., Cesari, M., Fieding, R. A., Visser, M., Engelke, K., … Kanis, J. A. (2018, December 1). The authors reply: Letter on: “pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: A need for a reference standard” by clark et al. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12387

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free