Complications of poly-l-lactic acid and polyglycolic acid (Plla/pga) osteosynthesis systems for maxillofacial surgery: A retrospective clinical investigation

24Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two second-generation PLLA/PGA bioresorbable osteosynthetic plate systems for oral and maxillofacial surgery are available in Japan. The two systems have different PLLA-PGA component ratios (RapidSorb®, 85:15; Lactosorb®, 82:18) and plate and screw shapes. We conducted a retrospective study to compare our clinical evaluation and examine the incidence of postoperative complications between the two plate systems. A retrospective survey was conducted in 148 patients (midfacial fracture/trauma (68.2%) and dentofacial deformity patients (31.8%); males (54.7%); median age, 37.5 years) treated using maxillofacial osteosynthetic plate systems. The complications included plate exposure (7.4%), infection, (2.7%), and plate breakage (0.7%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant correlation between sex (female), plate system (Lactosorb®), number of plates, and pyriform aperture and periorbital sites of plate placement (p < 0.05). Additionally, the propensity score-adjusted model showed a significant correlation between Lactosorb® and postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.007 (95% confidence interval, 1.001–1.055), p < 0.01). However, the two plate systems showed a low incidence rate of complications, and the plate integration and survivability were similar using 2.0-mm or 1.5-mm resorbable plate regardless of the plate system. Our findings suggest that female sex and a greater number of plates are risk factors for postoperative complications, whereas pyriform aperture and periorbital plate placements reduce the risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsuda, Y., Karino, M., Okui, T., & Kanno, T. (2021). Complications of poly-l-lactic acid and polyglycolic acid (Plla/pga) osteosynthesis systems for maxillofacial surgery: A retrospective clinical investigation. Polymers, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060889

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free