Effect of Alternate Nostril Breathing Exercise versus Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercise on Dyspnea and Fatigue among Asthmatic Patients

  • Ibrahim Abd El Kader A
  • Ahmed Ibrahim F
  • Abd-Elrahman Mohamed E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Dyspnea and fatigue are common symptoms among participants with asthma, significantly affecting their overall well-being. Breathing exercises, such as alternate nostril breathing and diaphragmatic breathing have gained popularity as complementary approaches to managing these symptoms. Aim: To evaluate the effect of alternate nostril breathing exercise versus diaphragmatic breathing exercise on dyspnea and fatigue among asthmatic patients. Design: A quasi-experimental research design with pre-and post-test was employed for this study. Setting: The study was conducted at the chest inpatient department and outpatient clinic of Cairo University Hospital. Sampling: A purposive sample of 60 participants with severe asthma, were randomly assigned to either group (1) that received alternate nostril breathing exercise or group (2) that received diaphragmatic breathing exercise. Tools: Three tools were used: (1)Participants' socio-demographic and medical related data, (II)Arabic version of the dyspnea-12 questionnaire, and (III)Arabic version of the brief fatigue inventory scale. Results: Post intervention, the total mean score of dyspnea in group 1and group 2 significantly decreased to(22.7±4.8;20.4±5.3)respectively compared to (33.0±3.3;33.9±4.7)respectively pre intervention. There was statistically significant difference in total mean score of fatigue(p=0.000**)pre and post intervention for both studied groups. Moreover, post intervention, there was no statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2in dyspnea total mean score (p=0.090), while there was statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in fatigue total mean score (p=0.005*). Conclusion: Both alternate nostril breathing and diaphragmatic breathing exercises can effectively improve dyspnea and fatigue among asthmatic participants, while, diaphragmatic breathing exercise demonstrated a superior effect on reducing fatigue compared to alternate nostril breathing exercise. Recommendations: Incorporating breathing exercises into the management of asthma could offer a non-pharmacological approach to alleviate dyspnea and fatigue, moreover, enhance participants' quality of life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ibrahim Abd El Kader, A., Ahmed Ibrahim, F., & Abd-Elrahman Mohamed, E. (2023). Effect of Alternate Nostril Breathing Exercise versus Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercise on Dyspnea and Fatigue among Asthmatic Patients. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 14(4), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2023.327339

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free