Use of gypsum/brucite mixed precipitate instead of gypsum in Portland cement

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The possibility of replacing the natural gypsum used in cement production by a chemical precipitate consisting of gypsum (CaSO4.2H2O) and brucite (Mg(OH)2), was investigated. This precipitate is a by-product of a new hydrometallurgical process, which was developed in order to treat economically low-grade nickel oxide ores. More specifically, it is obtained by hydrolytic precipitation of magnesium at temperatures not exceeding 80 °C, from sulfate solutions which result from heap leaching of nickel oxide ores with dilute sulfuric acid at ambient temperature, using calcium hydroxide as a neutralizing agent. The mixture generally consists of 20-30% non-fibrous magnesium hydroxide, 60-75% gypsum and any excess of calcium hydroxide, depending on the precipitation conditions. In the present work, a mixture was produced by hydrolytic precipitation at 25 °C, using 1.1 times the stoichiometric quantity of Ca(OH)2 required to precipitate all of the magnesium. The possibility of using the above precipitate as a substitute for gypsum in cement was examined by testing four different cement mixtures, one reference sample, containing 4.5% gypsum and 0.5% anhydrite ((PC)Ref) and another three with 4.1%, 5.2% and 6.3% of gypsum/brucite mixed precipitate ((PC)B/G), in the place of gypsum. All samples were tested by determining the grindability, setting time, expansion and compressive strength. The results of the physico-mechanical tests showed that the replacement of natural gypsum by the above precipitate did not affect negatively the quality of the produced cements. © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Agatzini-Leonardou, S., Karidakis, T., & Tsakiridis, P. E. (2005). Use of gypsum/brucite mixed precipitate instead of gypsum in Portland cement. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 80(3), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1199

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free