Abstract
“Speech is accompanied by an intricate set of gestural signals which affect meaning, emphasi and other aspects of utterances” Argyle (1972: 245). They are at least as influential as the verb; content of the message in determining how an individual is perceived (Rosenberg et al. 1986 Kopacz (2006) claims that non-verbal behaviours play an immense role in forming people judgements and may be used in political persuasion to elicit positive reactions from voters. Th obj ective of this paper is to analyze some of the most popular body signals sent by American an European politicians and show which of them are considered positive and strengthen the verb; message and which are said to be negative and make the performer look unprofessional and ur trustworthy. The next purpose is to determine which non-verbal channel such as eyes, faci hands, posture, legs is the strongest and attracts the greatest attention. © 2008, Versita. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rominiecka, M. (2008). Non-verbal cues in politics: An analysis of gestural signals sent by american and european politicians. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 44(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-008-0012-0
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.