Assessing the suitability of sets-based approaches: estimating the discriminative power of risk models for ordinal outcome treatments

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to evaluate the discrimination performance of an ordinal model for improved disease screening, a new test was proposed where information was obtained across all samples simultaneously. METHODS: The ordinal c-index builds upon the volume under the surface methodology without focusing on the accompanying receiver operating characteristic surfaces. However, it can be simplified to an average of pairwise c-indexes. In this paper, a set-based estimate (information was obtained across all samples simultaneously) was proposed by summing all correctly ordered groups. The asymptotic distribution of this proposed estimate was derived using U-statistics. RESULTS: A predictive model was applied using the blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio to discriminate stroke in evolution in acute ischemic stroke patients, which could potentially be life-saving in emergency departments. CONCLUSIONS: By conducting Monte Carlo simulations, it was concluded that the measure proposed herein is a better choice for clinical use because of the asymmetry of the predicted probabilities of groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, C. H., Lin, L. C., Chen, I. C., & Yen, C. H. (2017). Assessing the suitability of sets-based approaches: estimating the discriminative power of risk models for ordinal outcome treatments. International Health, 9(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihv058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free