Incidence and predictors of unplanned non-target lesion revascularisation up to three years after drug-eluting stent implantation: Insights from a pooled analysis of the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program

12Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: To compare the incidence and predictors of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and non-TLR after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES). Methods and results: We pooled patient-level data on 6,137 patients (Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent: 5,016, XIENCE everolimus-eluting stent: 1,121) in the RESOLUTE Global Program. At three years, clinically driven TLR, unplanned non-TLR, and no revascularisation occurred in 186, 618, and 5,333 patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, predictors of both TLR and non-TLR were pre-procedure diameter stenosis (%) (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.01-1.02], and OR 0.99 [0.99-1.00]), diabetes (OR 1.46 [1.07-1.99], and OR 1.37 [1.15-1.64]), and prior PCI (OR 1.42 [1.01-2.00], and OR 1.41 [1.18-1.68]). Baseline characteristics associated with TLR only were prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR 2.85 [1.91-4.27]), in-stent restenosis (OR 2.35 [1.43-3.83]), age (OR 0.98 per year [0.97-1.00]), hypertension (OR 1.64 [1.10-2.44]), and pre-procedure reference vessel diameter (OR 0.74 per mm [0.55-0.99]). Baseline characteristics associated with non-TLR only were lesion location (left anterior descending vs. all others) (OR 0.70 [0.59-0.83]), and hyperlipidaemia (OR 1.42 [1.15-1.75]). Conclusions: The cumulative incidence of non-TLR at three years in patients treated with current-generation DES was almost three times higher than TLR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdel-Wahab, M., Neumann, F. J., Serruys, P., Silber, S., Leon, M., Mauri, L., … Richardt, G. (2016). Incidence and predictors of unplanned non-target lesion revascularisation up to three years after drug-eluting stent implantation: Insights from a pooled analysis of the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program. EuroIntervention, 12(4), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY15M07_07

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free