Abstract
Grid re-analysis and satellite-based rainfall products offers a means of estimating rainfall information at both regional and worldwide level. Numerous rainfall estimates are accessible, each varying in terms of the retrieval algorithm, sensor instrumentation, spatial-temporal resolution, and geographical coverage. The objective of this research was to assess the accuracy of grid re-analysis precipitation dataset (ERA-5) and the satellite-derived rainfall dataset (IMERG) when compared to hourly rain gauge observations in Bali Province during the period spanning 2017 to 2020. To assess grid-based datasets, conventional point-to-pixel comparison methods, along with statistical metrics in the forms of continuous, categorical, and volumetric measurements. The comparative findings illustrate that IMERG exhibits superior performance at sub-daily scales in accurately detecting volume, whereas ERA-5 demonstrates greater capability in identifying rainfall events. Both products display a tendency to overestimate the capture of low to moderate rainfall occurrences and for underestimating intense to exceptionally heavy rainfall occurrences. The IMERG product excels across various elevations.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Aryastana, P., Wahyuni, P. I., Dewi, L., Punay, J. P., Haditama, I. G. N. H. R., & Jalakam, S. P. (2023). The Quantitative Comparison of Grid Re-analysis Rainfall Products, Satellite Rainfall Products, and Hourly Rainfall Gauge Observation over Bali Province. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 445). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344501020
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.