Development and validity of the Japanese version of the pre-sleep arousal scale

17Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hyperarousal, defined as increased levels of cortical activity and cognitive-emotional reactivity induced by stress, is suggested to be a key factor in insomnia. In particularly, pre-sleep arousal constitutes one of the major features of insomnia. The Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale is the best-known measure used to evaluate pre-sleep arousal. However, a well-validated Japanese version of the scale (PSAS-J) has not yet been established. The aim of this research was to develop and validate such a scale. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted via the internet. In total, 237 of 300 participants (mean age 43.28 ± 11.19 years) completely responded to the questionnaires as followed: the PSAS-J, the Insomnia Severity Index, Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test, and Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale. In addition, the participants were divided into two groups: insomniacs and normal sleepers. As a result, the PSAS-J had a two-factor structure similar to that of the original version, i.e., somatic and cognitive arousal subscales. The internal consistency (α = 0.85 to 0.90) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.67 to 0.78) were high. Correlations between the PSAS-J and the above-mentioned scales ranged from 0.35 to 0.53. Discriminant validity showed that the PSAS-J was distinct from the Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test and Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale. The PSAS-J scores were significantly higher in insomniacs than in normal sleepers. Our results suggest that the PSAS-J has high reliability and validity and that this scale is adequate for assessing pre-sleep arousal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Okajima, I., Ishii, M., Ochi, M., & Nicassio, P. M. (2020). Development and validity of the Japanese version of the pre-sleep arousal scale. Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 252(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.252.169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free