Neuroprotective and nephroprotective effects of remote postconditioning: Prospects for clinical use

2Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The results of experimental and clinical studies strongly suggest that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIP) has no neuroprotective effect during cardiac surgery performed under extracorporeal circulation. Remote preconditioning (RP) has no neuroprotective effect in hemorrhagic stroke. A randomized multicenter study is needed to evaluate the efficiency RIP in patients with ischemic stroke. RP reduces the severity of ischemia/reperfusion kidney injury during transplantation. RIP has been established to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy. There is a need for a multicenter trial to evaluate the efficiency of RIP in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Analysis of the presented data indicates that RIP fails to prevent cardiorenal syndrome in infants and children during cardiac surgery. The data available in the literature on the capacity of RIP to provide nephroprotective effect in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery are discordant and indicative of the advisability of a multicenter study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maslov, L. N., Tsibulnikov, S. Y., Tsepokina, A. V., Khutornaya, M. V., Kutikhin, A. G., Tsibulnikova, M. R., … Mrochek, A. G. (2016). Neuroprotective and nephroprotective effects of remote postconditioning: Prospects for clinical use. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. Media Sphera. https://doi.org/10.17116/terarkh2016888121-126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free