Abstract
Introduction: This quality assurance project was designed to determine the reliability, completeness and comprehensiveness of the data entered into Niday Perinatal Database. Methods: Quality of the data was measured by comparing data re-abstracted from the patient record to the original data entered into the Niday Perinatal Database. A representative sample of hospitals in Ontario was selected and a random sample of 100 linked mother and newborn charts were audited for each site. A subset of 33 variables (representing 96 data fields) from the Niday dataset was chosen for re-abstraction. Results: Of the data fields for which Cohen's kappa statistic or intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated, 44% showed substantial or almost perfect agreement (beyond chance). However, about 17% showed less than 95% agreement and a kappa or ICC value of less than 60% indicating only slight, fair or moderate agreement (beyond chance). Discussion: Recommendations to improve the quality of these data fields are presented.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dunn, S., Bottomley, J., Ali, A., & Walker, M. (2011). 2008 Niday perinatal database quality audit: Report of a quality assurance project. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 32(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.32.1.05
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.