Exome sequencing for structurally normal fetuses—yields and ethical issues

24Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The yield of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is well established in structurally normal fetuses (0.4–1.4%). We aimed to determine the incremental yield of exome sequencing (ES) in this population. From February 2017 to April 2022, 1,526 fetuses were subjected to ES; 482 of them were structurally normal (31.6%). Only pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants, per the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) classification, were reported. Additionally, ACMG secondary findings relevant to childhood were reported. Four fetuses (4/482; 0.8%) had P/LP variants indicating a moderate to severe disease in ATP7B, NR2E3, SPRED1 and FGFR3, causing Wilson disease, Enhanced S-cone syndrome, Legius and Muenke syndromes, respectively. Two fetuses had secondary findings, in RET and DSP. Our data suggest that offering only CMA for structurally normal fetuses may provide false reassurance. Prenatal ES mandates restrictive analysis and careful management combined with pre and post-test genetic counseling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Daum, H., Harel, T., Millo, T., Eilat, A., Fahham, D., Gershon-Naamat, S., … Mor-Shaked, H. (2023). Exome sequencing for structurally normal fetuses—yields and ethical issues. European Journal of Human Genetics, 31(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01169-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free