Edrophonium antagonism of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block: Dose requirements in children and adults

2Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This randomized, controlled study compared edrophonium dose requirements to antagonize cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block in children and adults. Sixty children, aged two to 10 years, and 60 adults aged 20 to 60 years, all subjects ASA physical status 1 or 2, having propofol, fentanyl and isoflurane-N2O anaesthesia, were studied. Cisatracurium 0.1 mg.kg-1 was given for muscle relaxation. Neuromuscular block was monitored with accelerometry. Edrophonium 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 1 mg.kg-1 or no anticholinesterase (controls) was given by random allocation to antagonize 90% neuromuscular block in each of the study groups (n = 12). Atropine 5 to 10 μg.kg-1 was given according to edrophonium dose. Onset time of cisatracurium-induced block in children was mean (SD) 2.4 (0.8) versus 4.1 (2.3) minutes in adults, P<0.01. The times to 10% spontaneous recovery of the first twitch (T1) were respectively, 28.4 (5.2) and 41.8 (6.1) minutes in children and adults, P<0.01. Spontaneous and antagonist assisted neuromuscular recovery was more rapid in children. Adequate neuromuscular recovery (train of four (TOF) ratio 80%) was achieved in children at 3 and 10 minutes after edrophonium 1.0 mg.kg-1 and 0.4 mg.kg-1, respectively. A TOF ratio of 80% was not achieved, within 10 minutes, with any of the four dose levels of edrophonium in adults. The dose of edrophonium to achieve a TOF ratio of 80% (EDTOF-80) after 5 and 10 minutes in children were, respectively, mean (SD) 0.85 (0.38) and 0.38 (0.19) mg.kg-1. The equivalent EDTOF-80 in adults was outside the edrophonium dose range studied.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdulatif, M., & El-Sanabary, M. (2001). Edrophonium antagonism of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block: Dose requirements in children and adults. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 29(4), 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0102900406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free