Expert testimony in court. 1: General principles

5Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Since the Woolf reforms were incorporated into legal practice in civil cases in England and Scotland, there has been a distinction between expert and professional witnesses. A common feature is the appointment of an agreed expert to give evidence on aspects of a case that require expert testimony. These changes do not apply in criminal cases nor in other jurisdictions such as the Republic of Ireland. However, all witnesses, whether professional or expert, must be objective, since their role is to assist the court. There is little or no training of clinicians in how to become an expert and suggestions for improving this are discussed. Practical aspects of accepting a brief from a solicitor are considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casey, P. (2003, May). Expert testimony in court. 1: General principles. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.9.3.177

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free