Mandibular incisor root length and root volume changes using removable anterior bite planes in two mealtime protocols in growing deep bite patients: a randomized clinical trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare mandibular incisor root length (RL) and root volume (RV) changes after 6 months of wearing either a removable anterior bite plane (RABP) during meals (F + M) or not during meals (F-M). Additionally, changes in incisal maximum bite force (IMBF) and their correlation with RL and RV changes were assessed. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six children with deep bite using RABPs full time were randomly assigned in equal numbers to either the F + M group or F-M group. Cone-beam computed tomographic radiographs and IMBF were recorded at baseline (CT0) and after 6 months (CT1). Within and between group comparisons of RL and RV were performed (P =.05) with Bonferroni correction applied for segmental RV differences (P =.008). Relationships between IMBF changes and RL and RV changes were analyzed (P =.05). Results: Both groups showed significant reductions in RL and RV. RL decrease in the F + M group (0.25 ± 0.14 mm) was significantly greater than in the F-M group (0.21 ± 0.14 mm). Reduction in RV was not significantly different between the groups, but IMBF significantly increased in both groups. Significant correlations were observed between IMBF changes and RL (r = 0.56) and RV (r = 0.86) changes. Conclusions: Deep bite correction using RABPs for 6 months with F + M protocol resulted in a greater decrease in mandibular incisor RL compared to the F-M protocol. However, RV changes were comparable between protocols. IMBF may influence the degree of RL and RV changes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sangwattanarat, T., & Thongudomporn, U. (2025). Mandibular incisor root length and root volume changes using removable anterior bite planes in two mealtime protocols in growing deep bite patients: a randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthodontist, 95(5), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.2319/121824-1034.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free