International open trial of uniform multi-drug therapy regimen for 6 months for all types of leprosy patients: Rationale, design and preliminary results

38Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the rationale, design and preliminary results of an open trial of 6 months uniform multi-drug therapy (U-MDT) for all types of leprosy patients assuming a cumulative relapse rate not exceeding 5% over 5 years of follow-up. Methods: We intended to recruit 2500 patients each in multi-bacillary (MB) and pauci-bacillary (PB) groups from India (five centres) and China (two centres). Standardized clinical criteria were used to assess skin lesions in the field. Results: A total of 2912 patients enrolled from November 2003 to May 2007 (India, 2746; China, 166). MB patients constituted 39% and 3% had grade 2 disability. During follow-up, 27 patients (0.9%) developed new lesions. Of these, 78% were on account of reactions. Six patients had clinically confirmed relapse. Clofazimine-related skin pigmentation was short-lived and was acceptable to patients. We analysed data for clinical status of skin lesions. About 2.9% of patients were lost to follow-up; 85.9% completed treatment, of whom 19% had inactive skin lesions. PB patients responded better than MB patients (27%vs. 6%; P < 0.001). At the end of the first (n = 2013) and second year (n = 807) of follow-up post-U-MDT, in 49% and 46% patients, lesions were inactive, respectively (59% and 57% in PB, 37% and 28% in MB; P < 0.001). Conclusion: U-MDT appears to be promising with respect to clinical status of skin lesions. © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kroger, A., Pannikar, V., Htoon, M. T., Jamesh, A., Katoch, K., Krishnamurthy, P., … Manickam, P. (2008). International open trial of uniform multi-drug therapy regimen for 6 months for all types of leprosy patients: Rationale, design and preliminary results. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 13(5), 594–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02045.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free