O-109 Reproductive health education: collaborative design of a learning platform for secondary school education involving reproductive health experts, pupils, and teachers

  • Delbaere I
  • Mertes H
  • Pening D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Study question: Which reproductive health information do pupils miss in their education and what is the optimal way of building a learning platform to close that gap? Summary answer: Teachers and students alike would welcome a novel fertility education platform. Ideally, the platform should organize information based on the educational objectives for enhanced usability. What is known already: Research on fertility awareness in the general population reveals lack of understanding among young people regarding crucial aspects of reproductive health, for example the age-related impact on fertility. Literature suggests that this knowledge gap should be addressed through diverse channels, including schools. Presently, school sexual education predominantly concentrates on preventing unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. Notably, the updated educational objectives in Flemish Secondary Education have recently incorporated the influence of lifestyle factors on fertility. Consequently, teachers have been urged to create novel instructional materials centered on this crucial theme. Study design, size, duration: This mixed-method observational study encompassed a baseline measurement with open and closed questions among 1700 third-grade secondary education pupils. Additionally, it involved focus group discussions with 6 teachers and 24 pupils. The baseline measurement occurred between February and April 2022, while the focus group interviews took place in April and May 2022. Participants/materials, setting, methods: A baseline measurement examined the knowledge of secondary school pupils aged between 15 and 19 years in Flanders (Belgium), explored current sexual education topics, their evaluations, and preferences for future reproductive health education. Focus group discussions investigated optimal delivery methods and structural frameworks for fertility learning materials. Main results and the role of chance: Survey results revealed that most pupils desired more information on reproductive issues, with some expressing a preference for a dedicated weekly course. Over 50% noted the absence of discussions about infertility, IVF, and egg freezing topics in school and expressed a desire for more information, a sentiment that was echoed in the focus groups with pupils. Teachers, in their focus groups, favored an online platform with structured teaching materials aligned with learning goals. With anticipated new learning goals by September 2023, teachers welcomed fertility-specific learning materials. Their preference went out to versatile resources (videos, quizzes, infographics) rather than ready-made courses or presentations, providing flexibility in lesson integration. Considering these insights, the following platform was developed: www.al-lesovervruchtbaarheid.be/en. Ongoing refinement occurred through workshops where teachers provided feedback for further enhancements to meet their instructional needs. Limitations, reasons for caution: A limited number of motivated teachers participated in the focus group discussions. Structured feedback collection has not taken place yet but is scheduled for February 2024. Wider implications of the findings: Implementing fertility education in secondary schools poses challenges due to an overloaded curriculum. The introduction of new learning goals, including one on the impact of lifestyle on fertility, provided an opportune momentum to integrate a fertility education learning platform. Trial registration number: not applicable Abstract citation ID: deae108.121 O-110 Adenomyosis : the challenge of classification and diagnosis Study question: What does the collaborative document on adenomyosis terminology, classification, and diagnosis by ESGE, ESHRE, and WES provides? Summary answer: This good practice recommendations paper offers guidance on the technical aspects, terminology, classification, and diagnosis of adenomyosis in women of reproductive age. What is known already: The existing literature on adenomyosis terminology is heterogeneous and confusing. Various classification systems based on ultrasound and MRI have been proposed, yet none have gained international acceptance or clinical validation. The contradictory data on the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities further complicate adenomyosis diagnosis in reproductive-age women. Study design, size, duration: A working group from ESGE, ESHRE, and WES has collaborated to write recommendations concerning the terminology, classification, and diagnosis of adenomyosis. Participants/materials, setting, methods: Focusing on terminology, classification , and diagnosis, this good practice paper paves the way for further recommendations on the management and surgical treatment of adenomyosis in reproductive-age women. Main results and the role of chance: The document overviews adeno-myosis terminology and reviews proposed classification systems based on histology, ultrasound, and MRI, concluding with diagnostic recommendations. Limitations, reason for caution: Owing the scarcity of evidence, these recommendations predominantly rely on clinical expertise. Wider implications of the findings: The recommendations aim to enhance existing adenomyosis guidelines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Delbaere, I., Mertes, H., Pening, D., Condorelli, M., Merckx, M., Bogaerts, A., … De Vos, M. (2024). O-109 Reproductive health education: collaborative design of a learning platform for secondary school education involving reproductive health experts, pupils, and teachers. Human Reproduction, 39(Supplement_1). https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae108.120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free