Radiographic comparison of vertical tibial translation using two types of suspensions on a transtibial prosthesis: A case study

20Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Limiting vertical displacement within the transtibial prosthesis is the primary objective of a suspension mechanism. Two types of suspensions, the neoprene sleeve and the silicone suction socket suspension with lock, were compared on a single patient by using radiographic measurement of vertical tibial displacement and vertical soft-tissue displacement. Measurements were taken in weightbearing, partial weightbearing, and nonweightbearing positions. Tibial displacement was similar for both suspension methods. The neoprene sleeve suspension allowed 1.8 cm more distal soft-tissue displacement than did the silicone suction socket suspension. The patient reported comfort in both suspensions, but noted more "pistoning" in the neoprene sleeve suspension. Copyright © 2001 American Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tanner, J. E. (2001). Radiographic comparison of vertical tibial translation using two types of suspensions on a transtibial prosthesis: A case study. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 13(1), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008526-200103000-00012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free