Sirolimus-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents for treatment of focal lesions in infrapopliteal arteries: A double-blind, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial

197Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims Preliminary reports indicate that sirolimus-eluting stents reduce the risk of restenosis after percutaneous infrapopliteal artery revascularization. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multi-centre, double-blind trial comparing a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent with a placebo-coated bare-metal stent in patients with either intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia who had a de-novo lesion in an infrapopliteal artery. Methods and results161 patients were included in this trial. The mean target lesion length was 31 ± 9 mm. The main study endpoint was the 1-year primary patency rate, defined as freedom from in-stent-restenosis (luminal narrowing of <50) detected with duplex ultrasound if not appropriate with angiography. Secondary endpoints included the 6-month primary patency rate, secondary patency rate, and changes in RutherfordBecker classification after 1 year. Twenty-five (15.5) patients died during the follow-up period. One hundred and twenty-five patients reached the 1-year examinations. The 1-year primary patency rate was significantly higher in the sirolimus-eluting stent group (80.6) than in the bare-metal stent group (55.6, P 0.004), and the 1-year secondary patency rates were 91.9 and 71.4 (P 0.005), respectively. The median (interquartile range) change in RutherfordBecker classification after 1 year was-2 (-3 to-1) in the sirolimus-eluting stent group and-1 (-2 to 0) in the bare-metal stent group, respectively (P 0.004). ConclusionMid-term patency rates of focal infrapopliteal lesions are substantially improved with sirolimus-eluting stent compared with bare-metal stent. Corresponding to the technical results, the changes in RutherfordBecker classification reveal a significant advantage for the sirolimus-eluting stent.Clinical Trial Registration Information: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00664963. © 2011 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rastan, A., Tepe, G., Krankenberg, H., Zahorsky, R., Beschorner, U., Noory, E., … Zeller, T. (2011). Sirolimus-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents for treatment of focal lesions in infrapopliteal arteries: A double-blind, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial. European Heart Journal, 32(18), 2274–2281. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr144

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free