A Review of Agency and Structure: Where does Rorty’s Ironist Stand?

  • Arab R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper intends to reread what Richard Rorty introduced as ironist in the context of one of the most contested topics in the realm of social sciences; i.e. agency and structure. Rorty maintains that ironist is the potential citizen of utopian liberal democracy. An ironist, in his words, is a person who a) has radical and continuing doubts about the final vocabulary she currently uses, b) realizes that argument phrased in her present vocabulary can neither underwrite nor dissolve possible doubts, and c) she does not think that her vocabulary is closer to reality than others. The main question of this study is where this conscious subject stands within the context of agency-structure dispute. First, relevant literature on the dichotomy is going to be examined, and then, while discussing other relevant terms in his philosophy, this paper will show how Rorty solves the agentic problem of his ironist with his introducing of the public-private distinction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arab, R. (2016). A Review of Agency and Structure: Where does Rorty’s Ironist Stand? European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(8), 36. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n8p36

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free