Comparative quantitation of DNA water tracers using OptiQ, Qubit, and Nanodrop

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have recently developed new synthetic DNA tracers for tracking sources and pathways of contamination in surface water and groundwater. The use of DNA tracers in natural water systems results in substantial and rapid dilutions, thus accurate quantitation of initial DNA tracer concentrations applied is crucial to ensure their successful downstream detections. We compared the sensitivity and accuracy of three portable analytical techniques for quantitation of these DNA tracers: Nanodrop, Qubit, and OptiQ. All three methods were about equally effective when measuring high concentrations of DNA tracers (e.g., for c-amine DNA tracer 1.54 × 105, 1.37 × 105, and 1.77 × 105 ng/mL for Nanodrop, Qubit, and OptiQ, respectively). However, the fluorescent methods of Qubit and OptiQ were significantly more sensitive at detecting lower concentrations of DNA tracers with limits of detection in the range 0.1–2 ng/mL, compared to 5 × 103 ng/mL for Nanodrop. The results of this work will facilitate the practical deployment of DNA tracers for tracking water contamination, and improving freshwater quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Billington, C., Schmidt, J., Mundle, R., Prenner, E. J., & Pang, L. (2023). Comparative quantitation of DNA water tracers using OptiQ, Qubit, and Nanodrop. Agrosystems, Geosciences and Environment, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free