The Pitfalls of Parliamentarisation: Why the Procedure of Appointing the European Commission should be Changed

  • Decker F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

After the European elections of 2014, the European Parliament managed to seize the power to select the Commission president from the EU heads of state and government. This democratic advance, however, is yet to find its counterpart in the subsequent process of selecting the other commissioners. For one thing, the entitlement to equal representation of all 28 member states hinders any reduction of the Commission to a more workable size. For another, because the right to nominate commissioners rests solely with the national governments, the composition of the Commission primarily reflects the partisan majorities of the Council rather than those of the Parliament, leading to a limited reflection of the president's mandate in the composition of the Commission. The following article examines how these problems could be resolved. It proposes a moderate amendment to the parity principle to reduce the Commission's size, a larger pool of candidates from which to select commissioners and the election of candidates by European citizens. The last proposal could even be implemented without any change to the treaties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Decker, F. (2014). The Pitfalls of Parliamentarisation: Why the Procedure of Appointing the European Commission should be Changed. European View, 13(2), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-014-0321-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free