Exploring the Role of Metacognition in Measuring Students’ Critical Thinking and Knowledge in Mathematics: A Comparative Study of Regression and Neural Networks

  • Varveris D
  • Saltas V
  • Tsiantos V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of open-ended problems in mathematics education. The traditional approach to teaching mathematics focuses on the repetitive practice of well-defined problems with a clear solution, leaving little room for students to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Open-ended problems, on the other hand, open-ended problems require students to apply their knowledge creatively and flexibly, often with multiple solutions. We herein present a case study of a high school mathematics class that incorporated open-ended problems into its curriculum. The students were given challenging problems requiring them to think beyond what they had learned in class and develop their problem-solving methods. The study results showed that students exposed to open-ended problems significantly improved their problem-solving abilities and ability to communicate and collaborate with their peers. The article also highlights the benefits of open-ended problems in preparing students for real-world situations. By encouraging students to develop their problem-solving strategies, they are better equipped to face the unpredictable challenges of the future. Additionally, open-ended problems promote a growth mindset and a love for learning, as students are encouraged to take risks and explore new ideas. Overall, the article argues that incorporating open-ended problems into mathematics education is a necessary step towards developing students’ critical thinking skills and preparing them for success in the real world.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varveris, D., Saltas, V., & Tsiantos, V. (2023). Exploring the Role of Metacognition in Measuring Students’ Critical Thinking and Knowledge in Mathematics: A Comparative Study of Regression and Neural Networks. Knowledge, 3(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3030023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free